Track Payment Processing Fees Across All Providers | Fee Reporting | WebFootprint
Payment Integrations Fee Tracking → Margin Control

Track Payment Processing Fees Across All Providers

Your P&L shows "payment fees" as one blurry lump. Without per-provider, per-method fee tracking you cannot negotiate, cannot route volume to cheaper rails, and cannot see when a provider quietly changed pricing.

We turn silent margin leakage into a controllable cost centre.

A glass Finance panel with fee percentage tiles connected by a mint light ribbon to a Fees Analytics badge, with PayFast, Yoco, and Peach fee statements mid-flight
3.2% + R2
PayFast Aggregation card fee (ex VAT), vs Instant EFT at 2.0% min R2
2.95% + R2
Yoco Online local card rate on Core; Peach cards typically 2.95% + R1.50
15–30%
typical fee reduction when merchants audit opaque pricing and renegotiate
1.5–3%
FX markup often layered on cross-border volume, invisible in a blended P&L line
The Problem

Sound Familiar?

These are the exact issues CFOs and ecommerce finance leads bring us before fee tracking:

  • Your P&L shows one blurry line for "payment fees", with no split by PayFast, Yoco, Peach, or Ozow
  • Card at 3.2%+R2 and Instant EFT at 2.0% look the same in the books, so nobody steers checkout
  • Finance spends hours each month stitching CSVs from three dashboards just to guess the effective MDR
  • A provider quietly changes pricing or you stay on legacy rates, and nobody notices for a quarter
  • International cards carry FX markup of 1.5–3% on top of advertised rates, buried in settlement files

On R200,000 monthly volume, published SA gateway stacks already diverge by more than R1,400 a month before FX, refunds, or payout fees. Scale that to R2M+ GMV and the gap is a board-level cost, not a rounding error.

How It Works

What Payment Fee Tracking Actually Does

Settlements land → fees normalise → effective MDR updates → finance acts. No more spreadsheet archaeology.

1

Settlements Ingested

Daily fee and volume feeds from every gateway you already use

2

Fees Normalised

Card, Instant EFT, BNPL, FX, refunds, and payouts mapped into one ledger

3

Effective MDR Reported

Per provider, per method, with alerts when rates drift or volume tiers unlock

4

Negotiate & Route

Finance walks into renegotiations and checkout decisions with hard numbers

What We Build

Everything You Need for Fee Tracking Reporting

Multi-Provider Fee Ingestion

Pull settlements and fee line items from PayFast, Yoco, Peach, Ozow, Stitch, and Stripe into one normalised fee ledger every day.

Effective MDR by Provider

See true cost as total fees ÷ volume per gateway and per method, not the advertised sticker rate on the sales page.

Method Mix & Routing Insights

Compare card vs Instant EFT vs Capitec Pay share against fee cost, so you know where checkout steering actually pays.

FX & Cross-Border Visibility

Surface FX markup and cross-border assessments that sit on top of domestic MDR, so international volume stops hiding margin leak.

Variance & Rate-Change Alerts

Flag when effective rates drift, a provider invoice jumps, or volume qualifies for negotiated tiers you are not yet on.

Finance-Ready Reporting

Monthly board packs and accounting exports that turn payment fees into a controllable cost centre, not a mystery line.

Providers We've Connected for Fee Analytics

PayFastYocoPeach PaymentsOzowStitchStripePayGateNetcash
Client Story

From 3.3% Effective MDR to 2.8%

How a Cape Town ecommerce brand processing R2.1M a month recovered R126K in year one once fee tracking made every rand visible.

Before

The Blurry P&L Line

  • PayFast, Yoco, and Peach fees dumped into one "bank charges / payment fees" account
  • Finance spent ~8 hours a month reconciling three CSV exports by hand
  • Instant EFT was only 18% of checkout despite a ~1.2pp fee advantage vs cards
  • International cards carried FX markup nobody measured against mid-market rates
  • Effective MDR sat at 3.3% with no owner accountable for the drift
3.3% MDR ~R69,300 fees on R2.1M GMV
After

The Controllable Cost Centre

  • Daily ingestion shows fee cost by provider and method before month-end
  • Board pack flags Instant EFT and Capitec Pay as the cheapest rails for SA cards-avoidable volume
  • Volume proof unlocked negotiated PayFast gateway pricing above R50k monthly average
  • Checkout prompts raised Instant EFT share from 18% to 34%
  • Effective MDR fell to 2.8%; statement reconciliation dropped to under an hour
2.8% MDR ~R58,800 fees on the same GMV
0.5pp drop in effective MDR
R126K recovered fees in year 1
7 hrs saved monthly on fee reconciliation
6 weeks to full project ROI
The Difference

Before vs After Fee Tracking

Before
After
Fee visibility
One P&L lump sum
Per provider & method
Effective MDR
Guessed from invoices
Calculated daily
Rate-change detection
Noticed next quarter
Alerted within days
Checkout routing
Default to card
Steer to cheaper rails
Negotiation leverage
Anecdotal volume claims
Auditable fee reports
Monthly finance time
6–8 hours of CSVs
Under 1 hour review
Getting Started

How It Works

From first conversation to live fee reporting in 2–4 weeks.

01

Map Your Providers

Which gateways you use, how settlements land, and what finance currently sees on the P&L.

02

Free Scoping Call

30-minute call to sample statements, estimate leakage, and design the fee tracking feed.

03

Build & Validate

We ingest live settlements, reconcile against provider invoices, and run parallel for a month-end cycle.

04

Go Live & Monitor

Dashboards and alerts go live. You negotiate and route with evidence, not gut feel.

Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How is this different from choosing a cheaper payment gateway?

Gateway comparison is a one-time selection decision. Fee tracking is ongoing analytics across the providers you already use: per-provider effective MDR, method mix, FX leakage, and rate-change detection. Most mid-size merchants run two or three gateways at once; without tracking, you cannot negotiate or route intelligently.

Which payment providers can you pull fee data from?

We regularly ingest PayFast, Yoco, Peach Payments, Ozow, Stitch, Stripe (for multi-market merchants), PayGate, and Netcash. If a provider exposes settlements via API, CSV export, or statement feed, we can include it.

What is effective MDR and why does it matter more than the advertised rate?

Effective MDR is total fees divided by total volume for a period. Advertised rates (for example PayFast at 3.2% + R2, or Yoco Online at 2.95% + R2) ignore flat fees, refunds, payout charges, international premiums, and FX markup. Effective MDR is the number that belongs on your cost centre report.

Will this replace our accounting system?

No. The feed normalises fee data and exports into Xero, Sage, or your BI stack as a clear cost centre. Your chart of accounts stays intact; payment fees simply stop being a single unexplained lump.

How quickly do we see savings?

Visibility is usually live within 2–4 weeks. Recovered margin follows once you renegotiate, qualify for volume tiers, or shift more checkout volume onto Instant EFT and Capitec Pay where the fee gap is about 1.2 percentage points versus cards on PayFast Aggregation.

How much does payment fee tracking cost?

Typical builds run from about R25,000 for a two-provider feed with monthly reporting, up to R45,000–R60,000 for multi-provider ingestion, FX breakdown, and board-ready dashboards. On R2M+ monthly GMV, a 0.3–0.5 percentage point drop in effective MDR usually pays for the project within one to two months.

Ready to see the real cost?

Stop Letting Payment Fees Hide in Your P&L

If processing fees are still a single unexplained line, you are negotiating blind and routing volume by habit.

Tell us which providers you use, roughly how much you process a month, and how finance currently reviews settlements. We will show you what automated fee tracking would surface in the first 30 days.

Chat with us